Fixed or Dynamic? How your cycling strategy determines your asset's success

A battery storage system that generates 7 to 8% more revenue without using a single additional cycle? Our simulations on a real-world asset show that it is not only the number of cycles that matters, but how intelligently they are managed.

As renewable energy expands, the need for grid flexibility is growing. At the same time, increasing competition is putting pressure on BESS revenues. While ancillary services currently provide a significant share of income, these markets are becoming saturated. By the early 2030s, spot market trading is expected to become the primary revenue source — requiring batteries to cycle more frequently.

This shift has important implications for battery warranties. Owners who negotiate based on today’s low-cycle assumptions risk limiting their asset’s future performance. The warranty terms agreed today will shape what a battery can deliver in 2030 and beyond.

Our whitepaper compares fixed and dynamic cycling strategies on the same real-world asset, using identical annual cycle budgets across the FCR and spot markets in 2025. The results show that dynamic cycling, which adapts to real-time market conditions, can increase revenue by 7 to 8% while staying within the agreed cycling limits.

Download our free whitepaper to learn how to prepare your BESS for changing market conditions. ➡️